Let's connect ↗Visual Inspect
Build an inspection workflow around IBM Maximo Visual Inspection capabilities. Connect image-based evidence, expert review and the operational response for a defined quality or asset-condition problem.
Asset programs are connecting inspection, condition signals and AI-assisted insight with work management. The difficult handoff is often between finding a problem and getting the right person to act with the right context.
Pragma Edge organizes asset work around See, Listen, Think and Act. We connect asset data, inspection evidence, monitoring and prioritization with planning and field execution, choosing the scope that fits the customer environment.
Start with a representative asset class and a maintenance journey. Validate data quality, agree when an observation warrants action, and review whether the resulting work improves the operating process before expanding coverage.
Inspection findings lose value when images sit in folders, defect labels mean different things to different teams or the observation never reaches the person responsible for action. The opportunity starts with one clearly defined inspection decision.
IBM Maximo Visual Inspection uses computer vision to help identify defects, anomalies and equipment issues in image-based inspection use cases.
Shape the solution around a visible condition that specialists can label consistently and an outcome they can verify.
Plan how observations are associated with an asset, item, location or inspection record.
Design the route from a finding to acceptance, reinspection or maintenance follow-up.
Define image collection, defect categories, review criteria and asset context. Connect inspection results to the customer maintenance process and evaluate performance on representative conditions.
Baseline the measures relevant to your engagement, then compare results through implementation and operation.
Illustrative use cases to shape your evaluation.
Choose one visible defect on one inspection point. Include good parts, borderline cases and lighting variation in the evaluation. Compare the reviewed findings with the current inspection process before extending to another line.
Agree what evidence a technician needs to capture and how the finding should affect maintenance. Keep the asset identity and inspection history with the image so the next team can understand the observation.
Agree a baseline and an acceptance threshold with the process owner. These are evaluation measures, not claimed customer results.
Bring representative images and expert labels. Ask to evaluate difficult cases, image quality and review handling. Confirm the selected IBM components, capture devices and integration scope for the proposed deployment.
Plan a focused product conversation ↗